Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months and by imprisonment for five months.

However, this judgment is delivered to Defendant A.

Punishment of the crime

Although the Defendants did not have money to pay the drinking value to the people who drink without any particular day, the Defendants conspired to drink in an entertainment drinking house for drinking time.

On November 14, 2014, around 19:50 on November 14, 2014, the Defendants ordered the payment from the “Fjuk” operated by the victim E, the victim E, who was in the racing-si.

However, the Defendants did not have any intent or ability to pay the price even if they were provided with alcohol or alcohol by the victim because all the money held by them is small and medium and does not have any credit card or other means of settlement.

In the end, the Defendants conspired to deception the victim and received 3.10,000 won or more from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Protocol concerning the suspect examination of the defendant B by the prosecution;

1. Protocol concerning the suspect interrogation of each of the Defendants

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (on-site photographs), investigation reports (attached documents), investigation reports (court rulings on related cases and summary orders);

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and the selective Defendants of the punishment: Articles 347 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A who is subject to suspended execution: The history of the two types of punishment under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants [the scope of recommendations] General Fraud types 1 (less than KRW 100 million) and mitigated areas (one month to one year) (special mitigation areas)

2. [Decision of Sentence] The amount of defraudation is not a large amount, but the Defendants have repeatedly committed the same scambling as the principal case: Provided, That the Defendants are decided as ordered in consideration of the following: (a) the Defendants have been smoothly agreed with the victims; and (b) the records and arguments, such as the age, criminal administration, family environment, etc., and the circumstances after the commission of the Defendants, and all the kinds of sentencing conditions prescribed in