The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant asserts to the effect that the Defendant, as stated in the judgment of the court below, conducted a one-person demonstration with the content as stated in the judgment below, merely stated facts in the process of resisting that he was unfairly dismissed, but did not intend to impair the Defendant’s reputation in bad faith, and that the statement of facts was unaware of the guidance that was the crime of defamation, and that there was no intention of defamation.

B. The sentence of the lower court’s improper sentencing (an amount of KRW 500,000) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. (1) According to the evidence duly admitted and examined by the lower court, the following facts can be acknowledged as to the assertion of mistake of facts.

(A) The Defendant is a person who was an environmental U.S. dollars dispatched from C to D, and the victim is a manager dispatched from C to D for facility management.

(B) Around April 25, 2015, the head of the U.S. dollars G of the D Environmental U.S. Team had 15,000 U.S. Team set up in the bus that she had ever worked for the victim by December 31, 2015 (Evidence 27 pages). (c) The Defendant was working for the victim by December 31, 2015, and the employment contract was not renewed, thereby making it impossible to work for C.

(D) On January 5, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 07:30 on May 5, 2016, at the Sungnam City F and D, the Defendant “The rule to set the principles” in the preceding sentence of Sungnam City F and D, shall be tried by the Director, the Director, the Director, the Head of the Ban that makes a false representation, and the Director, who received a bribe

(1) The bottom of the floor in the open area shall be brupted.

The author was at a disadvantage with a new service company that is not subject to re-contract with the director.

The term “a person’s demonstration was conducted by using the scamet in which the words “.” were written.

(2) Comprehensively taking account of the evidence as seen earlier, the following circumstances, namely, ① the said G g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g