The judgment of the first instance court is modified as follows. A.

The Defendant and the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) are the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff).

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited the same reasoning as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for modification as follows 2. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The 3rd side of the revised 8 line “the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff” added the 3rd 10 line “Except in extenuating circumstances,” and deemed the 3rd 11 line “the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff’s assertion” as “i.e., the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff’s assertion,” and the 3rd 17th 17 line of the 3rd 17th 20 line “...... the Defendants are obligated to deliver the Plaintiff-Counterclaim Intervenor’s claim until the Plaintiff-Lessee pays the said money to the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff.” The Defendants are obliged to take the 3rd 20 line of “each statement,” and the Defendants are obliged to take the 5th 5th 20 line of “each testimony and testimony of the witness H and G, and to take the 5th 10th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 13th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 6th 5th 6th 5th 100 of the agreement with the Defendants succeeding Plaintiff.

3. Conclusion, the Plaintiff’s principal lawsuit and the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff’s counterclaim should be accepted within the scope of the foregoing recognition, and the remainder of the claims should be dismissed for lack of good cause.

The judgment of the court of first instance is part of the judgment.