1. The defendant A is punished by imprisonment with prison labor for three months, and each of the crimes of fraud listed in the Decision 2 to 4.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] Defendant A was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor and one year of suspended execution on December 23, 201 after having been sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor on December 15, 201 and the above judgment became final and conclusive on September 23, 201. Defendant A was sentenced to five years of imprisonment with prison labor on September 8, 2016 in the Sungnam branch of Suwon branch of Suwon branch of the Suwon branch of the Suwon branch of the Republic of Korea, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on July 11, 2017.

Defendant

C On September 8, 2016, with the sentence of one year and six months to be a crime of fraud in the Sungnam branch of Suwon District Court, the above judgment became final and conclusive on July 11, 2017.

[Criminal facts]

1. On December 21, 2010, Defendant A made a false statement to the effect that, at the real estate brokerage office located in Songpa-gu Seoul, Defendant A purchased the victim Q Q, and that, at the time of purchasing the plastic superficies in Gangnam-gu Seoul, the development zone, Defendant A would have obtained the right to move in in the commercial building clearly.

However, there is no guarantee that the victim of the above superficies has the right to move into the commercial building even if purchased, and the defendant A did not have the intent or ability to allow the victim to move into the commercial building.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received the delivery of KRW 55 million from the victim, and acquired it by fraud.

2. On January 4, 2012, the Defendants made a false statement to the effect that, at the real estate brokerage office for Defendant A working in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant purchased some vinyl buildings among Gangnam-gu Seoul, a development zone, to the effect that the Defendant would acquire the right to occupy a commercial building clearly.

However, the Defendants did not have the intent or ability to allow the victims to move into the commercial building because they did not guarantee the right to move into the commercial building even if they purchased the above superficies.

Defendant

A, as such, by deceiving the victim and deceiving the victim, A obtained the amount of KRW 60 million from the victim and acquired it by fraud.

3. On February 14, 2012, Defendant A purchases the victim’s right at the same place as above 2. Paragraph 2., and some of the Gangnam-gu T, a development zone, superficies, thereby ensuring the right to move into a commercial building.