logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2014.08.21 2013구합19103
보상금증액
Text

1. The Defendant: 211,58,800 won to the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from July 30, 2013 to August 21, 2014.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

(a) Project name: 1) Housing site development project (B) (hereinafter referred to as “instant project”);

2) Public announcement of project approval: Defendant: C publicly announced by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on August 5, 2008, D3 project operators announced by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on September 30, 201:

B. Subject to the expropriation ruling by the Central Land Expropriation Committee on January 18, 2013 (hereinafter “instant expropriation ruling”): The land owned by the Plaintiff is the Songpa-gu Seoul E-ro, Songpa-gu and 2,165 square meters and F 2,774 square meters (hereinafter “bresh land”), and each land is referred to as “breshed land” with its lot number alone.

(2) Compensation for losses on March 13, 2013: 2,001,109,500 won for E’s land, and 2,588,280,700 won for F’s land; 4,589,390,200 won for E’s land (hereinafter “adjudication compensation”).

4) Appraisal Corporation: New appraisal corporations in the future and central appraisal corporations (hereinafter “appraisals for expropriation”) and the results of appraisal are “appraisals for expropriation”.

C. On June 20, 2013, the Central Land Expropriation Committee rendered an objection on June 20, 2013: An appraisal corporation and the Korea Appraisal Board (hereinafter referred to as the “Appraisal Board”) for a stock company; the result of the appraisal is referred to as the “appraisal of objection”; and both the appraisal of expropriation and the appraisal of objection, “appraisal of adjudication”.

(2) On June 20, 2013, the Central Land Expropriation Committee dismissed the Plaintiff’s objection against the instant adjudication on expropriation on the ground that the amount of compensation determined by the adjudication on expropriation is deemed to be reasonable when based on the result of the said adjudication on expropriation.

3) Meanwhile, on February 26, 2013, the Plaintiff reserved an objection and received the said adjudication compensation from the Defendant. D. The ownership relationship of the instant land and the background of expropriation 1) the instant land was determined as the site for urban planning facilities (waste disposal facilities) by the Seoul Special Metropolitan City public notice on August 5, 1998, and was publicly announced as the implementation plan for urban planning projects (H) on September 20, 199 (hereinafter “instant waste disposal facilities construction projects”).

Accordingly, it.

arrow