1. In light of the records of this case, the Defendants are jointly and severally responsible for the purport and cause of the claim of this case.

1. Circumstances and results of appraisal of the ruling;

A. Business approval and public announcement, etc. - Free economic zone development projects (D; hereinafter “instant projects”) - F public notification of the Ministry of Knowledge Economy on May 6, 2008, E Ministry of Knowledge Economy on September 3, 2013 - Business operator: Defendants.

B. The Central Land Expropriation Committee’s ruling on expropriation on November 20, 2014 (hereinafter “instant adjudication on expropriation”): [Attachment 1] - Each land listed in [Attachment 1] column (hereinafter collectively referred to as “instant land,” and the individual land shall be specified only with its parcel number) - Compensation for losses totaling KRW 2,318,40,300 (the specific details shall be as indicated in [Attachment 1] list of compensation - The date of commencement of expropriation: An appraisal corporation on December 22, 2014 - An appraisal corporation at sight and a dialogue appraisal corporation (hereinafter referred to as “instant adjudication on expropriation”).

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on an objection (hereinafter “the instant ruling”) dated August 20, 2015 - Contents of the ruling: Increase of the compensation amount to KRW 2,357,021,400 in total to KRW 2,357,021,400 (the specific details shall be as indicated in [Attachment 1’s Schedule of Compensation] - An appraisal corporation: An ordinary appraisal corporation (hereinafter “instant appraisal”) and a third appraisal corporation (hereinafter “instant appraisal”):

D. The result of the appraisal commission and the result of the commission of the appraisal supplementation to the appraiser G of this Court (hereinafter “court appraisal”) - The court appraisal is based on the present status of the instant land at the time of the appraisal of expropriation and the appraisal of this case at the time of the appraisal of expropriation of this case and the appraisal of this case at the same time of the appraisal of expropriation of this case (the detailed details are as stated in [Attachment 1] - The court appraisal supplement is based on the premise that H, I, and J land was lawfully altered in form and quality, and H, I, J, and K are based on the premise that part of the instant land is the site of the building legally constructed and its appurtenant land.