A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, at around 00:30 on October 15, 2012, under the influence of alcohol, expressed the victim D (year 54) who is a security guard of the apartment in question, without any reason, under the influence of alcohol, talks about the victim D (age 54) to the victim D (age 54) for the number of treatment days in one time, while the victim’s head E (age 58) who is another security guard in his/her hands three times in his/her hands on the ground that he/she knows himself/herself, and caused injury to E (age 58) for the number of days of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes as a result of inquiry into the head of the F Hospital;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 of the same Act concerning the crime, the selection of fines;

1. Article 10 (2) and Article 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act for mitigation of mental disorders;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion about the defendant and his defense counsel under Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Code for the confinement in the Nowon-gu Station: although the defendant sought to ask about the defendant's defense room, the security guard D did not answer the defendant's inquiry, closed the door of the security room and prevented the defendant from leaving the security room without going through the defendant's inquiry; after the security guard E entered the security room and pushed the defendant into the security room, the security guard prevented the defendant from leaving the security room and pushed the defendant, and the above security guards were faced with the defendant's body that the defendant attempted to escape from it, and therefore, the defendant's above act constitutes a justifiable act. However, according to the evidence examined by the court, the defendant found in the above security room and caused an injury to the security guard with the wheels of the security guards while going through dispute with the security guards. Thus, the defendant's act was committed by the defendant.