logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2014.11.19 2013구단14873
요양불승인처분취소
Text

1. On October 24, 2012, the Defendant’s disposition to revoke the Plaintiff’s refusal to receive medical care (change).

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

1. On April 12, 2004, the Plaintiff became an employee of the Amateur Factory and worked in one assembly part. On October 5, 2012, the Plaintiff filed an application for medical care benefits with the Defendant on the following grounds: (a) on October 5, 2012, the Defendant approved only the medical care for the “Tind salt” on the ground that the degree of escape does not clearly indicate the state of injury and that the degree of escape does not increase in the degree of escape.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant disposition”). [Ground of recognition] There is no dispute, A 1 to 3

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. Since excessive burden is accumulated due to the Plaintiff’s assertion assembly of automobiles, the instant injury or disease was caused and deteriorated, the instant disposition made on a different premise is unlawful.

B. The facts of recognition are as follows: (1) from April 13, 2004 to around 3:6 months in circulation of the content of the work and the details of the work of the work; (2) from around April 13, 2004, the performance of the work of approximately 15 work processes, such as entering into a spread, sad, setting up a sad, concluding a human media showe, concluding connection, concluding a blick, concluding a blling license, and concluding a leveling license. On February 5, 2005, the execution of the work of weekly and night shift ( weekly work 08:30-20:30, night work 20:30-30, night work 12:30-13:30, night rest 24:30-01:30, and other work hours 2:0-10 minutes after the rest of 10-2 hours in the daytime; and (3) conclusion of the call-up work; (4) conclusion of the Media.

A. daily work volume: approximately 400 (2) medical opinion, Plaintiff’s opinion, and Plaintiff’s doctor’s opinion (as of September 18, 2012, the Agym University Hospital) - diagnosis by MRI’s results, C3-4, C6-7 HNP (HNP) as a result of MRI’s examination at the Agym Hospital, as a result of the Egym from the right hand hand hand hand, and the main work was to set up the upper part of the vehicle’s body with two arms as its head.

arrow