logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.01.23 2014누2647
요양불승인처분취소
Text

1. Revocation of the first instance judgment.

2. On July 26, 2012, the Defendant’s disposition of non-approval for medical care was revoked.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On July 10, 1989, the Plaintiff, who was employed in Abandoned Motor and worked for more than 22 years in a assembly from 1st to 22 years. On March 19, 2012, at around 22:00, 2012, 22:3:00, the Plaintiff was suffering from a serious pain on the ground; however, on the same day, on the day, she continued work, and at the health center, she did not show symptoms of physical therapy. On March 26, 2012, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as to the escape from the 5th century-1,000 plenary signboard (hereinafter “instant injury”). On the recommendation of the internal advisory doctor, the Plaintiff received the Defendant’s request for medical care on May 15, 2012, and filed a request for medical care at the hospital of the 201st century.

B. On July 26, 2012, the Defendant rendered the instant disposition that rejected the Plaintiff’s application for medical care on the ground that there is no proximate causal relation between the instant shopping branch and the Plaintiff’s business.

[Reasons for Recognition] Gap evidence Nos. 1, 6, 7, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 10 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Gap witness C's testimony and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the instant disposition was unlawful on the grounds that the Plaintiff had been employed as an employee of the production company and engaged in work or engaged in work with approximately 22 years of 22 years of 90 degrees of her job, and that the instant injury and disease occurred as a result of excessive force or the instant injury and disease occurred.

B. The Defendant’s disaster investigation report on July 11, 2012 and the Defendant’s on-site investigation conducted on the part of July 1, 2012 is as follows: The Plaintiff’s age is 47 years of age, height is 174 cm, and body weight is 67 km at the time of the occurrence of the instant injury. The Plaintiff entered into an operation where the knife chere chere c and chere chere chere chere chere chere chere chere chere chere chere chere and chere chere chere chere chere chere chere chere chere chere

arrow