logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.08.09 2015나29390
분양대금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the first instance court's reasoning, except for the removal or dismissal as stated in paragraph (2) below. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. In the part of the first instance court’s deletion or dismissal, the “Dong” in Section 12 of the second instance judgment shall be deleted.

Part 3 of the judgment of the first instance court states "240,840,900 won" in Part 3 as "240,840,000 won", each of the "tax sanctions" in the part 6, 13, and 7, 20 in the part 6, 10, 15 in the part 14, and "the defendant" in the part 12 in the part 14, 12 in the part 3, as "taxes", respectively.

3. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow