logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2013.08.28 2013고정1673
산업안전보건법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

Defendant

If B does not pay the above fine, 50.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A Co., Ltd. is a business owner who performs construction work from January 30, 2012 with seven full-time workers awarded a subcontract of KRW 53,900,000 to a 53,900,000 and is a representative director of the above construction site and is a representative director of the Defendant A Co., Ltd. who is responsible for the safety and health of workers belonging to the above construction site.

1. On March 17, 2012, Defendant B, at around 14:00, ordered workers E to dismantle the work launch plate of the non-department 1 to move to two parts of the non-department 2, from the first part of the "New Housing Construction Corporation in the Yeongdeungpo-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-si" located outside the site of the "New Housing Construction Corporation" located in the Suwon-gu, Suwon-si.

If workers might be at the time of conducting work at a place where workers might fall or fall down, the business owner shall install a work plate by means of assembling the vision, etc.

Where it is impracticable to install a work launch board, a safety control net shall be installed.

Provided, That where it is impracticable to install a safety control net, measures necessary to prevent falling risk, such as having workers wear a safety belt, shall be taken.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, without taking such safety measures as above, forced workers to dismantle the work plate in one unit of the pair line, outside the building, and caused the injury requiring medical care for 84 days in the name of two wounds, such as the fall (1.8 meters high) while he was moving from the work plate outside the building to the second part of the bridge, after attaching stone to the outer wall, from the work plate of the first half line of the building outside the building.

2. Defendant A Co., Ltd. violated B, a representative director, with respect to the Defendant’s business as described in paragraph (1) above.

Summary of Evidence

1..

arrow