The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. There is no fact that the Defendant, by hand, knife a line of order keeping, knife a line of order keeping and knife a line of order keeping.

B. In light of the legal principles, the instant assembly merely constitutes an outdoor assembly as provided by the Assembly and Demonstration Act, but constitutes an outdoor assembly even if it does not constitute an outdoor assembly.

Even by hand, the maintenance line set by the police exceeds the minimum scope necessary for the maintenance of order, and even if the defendant damaged the maintenance line, the defendant's act constitutes a justifiable act by setting up against the illegal exercise of public authority which unreasonably limits the freedom of assembly and thereby restoring it.

C. The sentence imposed by the court below on the grounds of unreasonable sentencing (the fine of 500,000 won) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below as to the assertion of mistake of facts, i.e., (i) the Busan Coast Guard Guard Communication and the police officer AC, the investigation agency and the court below stated in the court below that “the defendant heard that the defendant is able to set up a polysium at the Busan Coast Guard P in front of his polysium, and the defendant is going to the direction of the Busan Regional Police Agency, and he returned to the defendant's own rear, and the defendant was able to kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't and kn't kn't kn't kn't kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's k's k's k's kn't k's k's k'.