Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000, respectively.

The Defendants did not pay the above fines.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendants in violation of the Assembly and Demonstration Act shall be members of the Csi Workers’ Union located in Sejong Special Self-Governing City.

From around 08:00 on May 19, 2014 to Sejong Special Self-Governing City, the Defendants demanded that the 250 members of the 36 Sejong Special Self-Governing City should participate in an assembly of the name "the resolution for the resolution for the rule-making of viewing and viewing of the Sejong Special Self-Governing City" in front of the 36 Sejong Special Self-Governing City, and that the si in public city should not operate the si in Sejong Special Self-Governing City, but attempted to enter the si to "the sito enter the sito to the sito" with other participants.

From 10:00 on the same day, the Sejong Police Station D sent a warning to the effect that it is punished if the order keeping line is invaded on three occasions. However, at around 10:15 on the same day, the Defendants invaded the order keeping line installed in the vicinity of the above assembly site without justifiable grounds, and moved about 5 meters from the entrance door door of the viewing hall.

2. The Defendants engaged in obstruction of performance of official duties, at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), and attempted to enter the entrance entrance door of the Sejong Viewers, as stated in paragraph (1). F, G, H, etc., a auxiliary police officer affiliated with the Chungcheongnamnam Provincial Police Agency, controlled the Defendants.

As such, Defendant B committed assault, such as placing the string of the maintenance line, keeping the auxiliary police officers, such as the above F with her head and body, keeping the auxiliary police officers such as the above H with his body, keeping the auxiliary police officers such as the above H with his hand, and harming the chests of the above police officers by shaking their failure.

As a result, the Defendants interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the order management of FF, which is a police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Application of each statute on the statement by police to I, J, K, G, H, and F

1. Defendants: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the obstruction of performance of official duties, the choice of fines) and Article 24 Subparag. 3 and Article 13 of the Assembly and Demonstration Act.