beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Around February 21, 2019, the Defendant embezzled the lost property embezzlement without taking necessary measures, such as acquiring one copy of the C Bank C Bank C Bank C Bank C Bank C Bank C Bank C, lost D, and returning it to the victim, in the street near the Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government “C Bank” around February 21, 2019.
2. On February 22, 2019, the Defendant violated the Fraud and Specialized Credit Finance Business Act: (a) around 09:17, at the “G store” located in Yongsan-gu Seoul, Seoul, in purchasing coffee, presented the cream card acquired as described in paragraph (1) to his/her employee as if he/she had finished with it as if he/she was his/her card; (b) had the cream make the cream settle the amount equivalent to KRW 2,000 from that time until February 26, 2019; and (c) used the lost debit card by settling the total amount of KRW 192,400 in total seven times, such as the list of crimes, from that time until February 19:55, 2019.
3. On February 22, 2019, at around 19:15, the Defendant violated the Specialized Credit Financial Business Act: (a) visited at a “I restaurant” located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan City H; (b) thereby recognizing information on the said card by means of contact with the settlement terminal of an unmanned device installed therein; (c) thereby allowing 6,300 won for food to process information by inputting information without authority into the information processing device, such as computer, etc.; and (d) using the lost debit card.
4. On February 26, 2019, the Defendant attempted to purchase biological items, such as the market value of KRW 17,800, in the “Kart” located in the Guro-gu Seoul High Court on February 26, 2019, and to purchase biological items, such as the purchase of biological items equivalent to the market value of KRW 17,800, and attempted to pay the price by deceiving an employee under his/her name as if he/she was his/her card, but did not refuse to approve the settlement, but did not lead to an attempted attempt.
Summary of Evidence
1. The defendant;