logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2014.11.20 2014누48438
건축허가처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the partial completion or addition as follows. As such, this is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Part 5 of the second parallel " November 15, 2007" shall be applied to " November 16, 2007".

B. Part 5 of the 12th sentence was pronounced “............... were sentenced, and the appeal was dismissed in entirety (Supreme Court Decision 2013Na1907) and the final appeal (Supreme Court Decision 2014Da32366).”

(1) In order to grant permission pursuant to Article 11, the authority to grant permission for mountainous district conversion and report under Articles 14 and 15 of the Management of Mountainous Districts Act shall, in order to grant permission pursuant to Article 11, add the following matters to the provisions of the related Acts and subordinate statutes, such as an order to cancel the construction of a building in the form or form as prescribed by Presidential Decree.

arrow