logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.04.21 2015나23079
사해행위취소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the submission or addition of the following, and therefore, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The second part of the judgment of the court of first instance, " August 31, 2012" of the second part of the judgment of the court of first instance, shall be written with " August 31, 2010."

Part 2 of the Judgment of the first instance court "80,000,000 won" shall be added to "830,000,000 won".

The second instance judgment of the first instance court "49,092,420 won" shall be added to "42,092,420 won".

The third part of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be subject to " March 26, 2012" as " August 31, 201."

3. On August 31, 2012, 201, i.e., "S. 31. 8. 1. Ma. 31. 2012" of "S. 3. 1. 8. 3. 1. 3. The judgment of the court of first instance is made by adding "S. 26. 3. 201" to "S. 31. 31. 201."

§ 30,00.

Part 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance (hereinafter referred to as "the fact that it appears to have purchased 20 times higher than that of 20 times higher than that of 20 times higher than that of 20 times higher than that of 20 times higher than that of 30 million won") shall be applied.

In the judgment of the first instance court, the part "3. (a) establishment of preservation claims" shall be added as follows:

A. In principle, it is required that a claim protected by the obligee’s right of revocation has arisen prior to the commission of an act that can be viewed as a fraudulent act. However, there is a high probability that at the time of the fraudulent act, there has already been a legal relationship that serves as the basis for the establishment of the claim, and that the claim should be established in the near future by virtue of such legal relationship.

arrow