1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The appeal cost (including the cost of participation) shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the plaintiff at the court of first instance is not different from the argument in the court of first instance, and the judgment of the court of first instance rejecting the plaintiff's claim is justified even if the evidence submitted at the court of first instance is examined together with the plaintiff's assertion of evidence Nos. 26 and 28 (including the provisional number) additionally submitted at the court of first instance.

Therefore, the reasoning for the statement in this case is that the court below's reasoning is as follows: "2.52" of the first instance judgment No. 2, No. 10; "41.04" of the first instance judgment No. 11; "No. 6; "No. 1365;" "No. 1356;" "No. 1366;" "No. 7, No. 13;" "a disposition of recognition" of No. 13; "No. 29, Feb. 29, 199;" "No. 8, No. 3;" "on-site investigation" of No. 11; "on-site investigation" of No. 6; "on-site investigation" of No. 11; "Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act; and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, respectively; and therefore, the ground for the first instance judgment shall be cited as it is, pursuant to Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.