logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원 2016.12.22 2015누7264
사업계획승인처분무효확인 등
Text

1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. The plaintiff (Appointed)'s primary claim and the conjunctive claim are all made.

Reasons

1. Details of the instant disposition

A. On April 24, 2013, the Intervenor filed an application for the instant project plan with the following business plans (hereinafter referred to as “instant project plan”) attached to the Defendant on April 24, 2013, including the following business plans (hereinafter referred to as “instant project plan”), and the permission to occupy and use the instant project plan pursuant to Article 31(3) of the former Support for Small and Medium Enterprise Establishment Act (amended by Act No. 1278, Jun. 3, 2014; hereinafter the same shall apply) on the ground of the size of 1,644.56 square meters (hereinafter referred to as “instant application site”).

The product name of this case: The use of organic fertilizers for the purpose of use: The quantity of raw materials and the quantity of raw materials for agricultural fertilizers used (unit/month) the product name of the production (unit/month), the compost of the livestock industry, the mushroom distribution, the king, the 1,500 tons and the 500 tons and the 2,500 tons of organic fertilizers for 1,50 tons and the 500 tons of organic fertilizers for 1,50 tons and the 2,500 tons of organic fertilizers for : 8 hours per day (the 25th day of a month/ the 300th day of a year).

B. On October 4, 2013, the Defendant rejected the Intervenor’s application for approval of the instant project plan on the grounds that “the development activity was not possible due to the failure to submit a supplementary report on the result of the measure.” (ii) The Intervenor filed an administrative appeal seeking revocation of the said non-permission disposition with the Jeonnam-do Administrative Appeals Commission on October 10, 2013, and the said commission filed an administrative appeal on December 27, 2013. The Intervenor’s project plan in the instant case is both the standards and approval requirements under the related Acts and subordinate statutes deeming the Small and Medium Enterprise Establishment Support Act or the authorization and permission.

arrow