beta
Text
1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 8,000,000 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from April 23, 2015 to April 22, 2016; and (b) the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff was aware of Nonparty C from 2010, and the Defendant was in a marital relationship with Nonparty C.
B. Around December 26, 2012, the Defendant maintained a long-term relationship with the Plaintiff with the head of the D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D DD, received the said head by sending a letter to the effect that the Plaintiff may suspend the Plaintiff’s role as a member. On July 14, 2014, the Defendant sent a written application to the head of the E D D D D D D D D D D D
C. From F 23:52 and G 00:11 of the same year, the Defendant posted “I” on the free bulletin board on the H-Gun website of the H-Gun Office as “I” title.
In May 1, 2012, it is known that the families of men who became aware of while working at the drinking house prior to entering the Plaintiff D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D's members have been already withdrawn from D D D D's music group, but it is still written by the photograph of the members of D's music group.
Confirmation Tradrida
"" posted a letter. D.
Around July 2014, the Defendant, along with the Plaintiff’s pictures, fabricated the pictures showing that C and C have a relationship of internal combustion with the Plaintiff, sent them by mail to the membersJ of the D and received them by the saidJ.
E. The Plaintiff filed a complaint against the Defendant on the same facts as described in paragraphs (b) through (d) above. The investigative agency, despite the fact that the Plaintiff sent the above mail on the facts described in the said paragraphs, was found to have been aware of the fact that the Plaintiff was not able to perform the duty in light of the Plaintiff’s relationship with the addressee, and was prosecuted for the facts described in
F. As a result, the Defendant, as the Ulsan District Court Decision 2015Ma780, Jan. 28, 2016, with the aim of slandering against the Plaintiff, even though the Plaintiff did not have established an internal relationship with C or left the family of another male by failure, with the intent of slandering the Plaintiff, even though they did not have been withdrawn from the D.