Text
1. The Plaintiff:
A. Defendant B, I, J, K, L, and N are each money listed in the “paid amount” column in the attached Table, as well as each of them.
Reasons
1. On October 21, 2014, the Plaintiff received a telephone from an unqualified person who referred himself/herself as the prosecutor.
He stated to the Plaintiff that “the party’s passbook was used for a crime, so it was so that the party’s passbook was connected to the public prosecutor’s office homepage and input information on the account in possession.”
On the same day, the Plaintiff entered all financial information related to his own account by accessing the website of the fake Public Prosecutor's Office in accordance with the direction of the person who was unable to receive the above name.
The crime organization of Bophishing, including a person without name, transferred money equivalent to the amount stated in the separate sheet “amount of transmission” column in the separate sheet to each Defendants’ account opened in the financial institution listed in the Defendants’ Schedule from the Plaintiff’s new bank, Han Bank, Foreign Exchange Bank, SK Securities, etc. account entered by the Plaintiff.
(A) Of the money transferred from the Plaintiff to the respective accounts of the said Defendants, the money remaining at present is indicated in the column of “the balance” in the attached Table.
[Ground of recognition] - With respect to Defendant B, I, J, K, L, and N: deemed confession (Article 150(3) and (1) of the Civil Procedure Act) - With respect to the remaining Defendants: In the absence of dispute, the purport of the entire pleadings as a result of each order to submit financial transaction information to Defendant B, I, J, K, L, and Pungdong Saemaul Depository, as a result of the order to submit each of the financial transaction information to a national bank, an industrial Bank, an Industrial Bank of Korea, a community credit cooperative, a foreign exchange bank, a new bank, a bank, a bank, a Korean Bank, NF, NF,
2. Determination as to the claims against Defendant B, I, J, K, L, and N
A. As a result of the instant Bophishing crime with the indication of the claim, the Defendants gain profits equivalent to the amount stated in the separate sheet "amount" as stated in the separate sheet without any legal ground, and the Plaintiff suffered losses equivalent to each of the same amounts, and thus the Defendants suffered such losses.