logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2017.06.29 2017고정181
폭행
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. On January 7, 2017, the Defendant: (a) entered the instant place, the purpose of which is to take a taxi driven by the victim D(34 tax) in the front of the apartment site C, Jinju-si; (b) brought an dispute over the payment of the taxi fee card; (c) brought a batus to the victim; (d) fating the victim’s bat; and (e) fating the victim’s bat; and (e) abused the victim’s bat at one time by having the victim’s chest fat down from the taxi into the fat of Jinju-si.

2. We examine the judgment. This is a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. The records reveal that the victim expressed his/her wish not to punish the defendant after instituting the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.

arrow