The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

The defendant A of the public prosecutor's office is an unqualified person, and the victim B is an employee of C.

On May 15, 2020, the Defendant ordered urban village around 15:29 on the 1st floor of the building D in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, but did not receive orders from the victim, and assaulted the victim's clothes on the ground that he spits spit spit spit spit spit sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sats

Judgment

The facts charged in the instant case fall under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the express intent of the victim pursuant to Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

According to the records, it is recognized that the withdrawal of the complaint and the non-exclusive statement of punishment submitted to this court on December 29, 2020, to the effect that the prosecution of this case does not want the punishment of the defendant prepared by the victim B after September 7, 2020.

Therefore, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act, since it constitutes a case in which a victim’s express intent not to prosecute a crime is expressed.