(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2016.11.17 2015고정1232

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2016.11.17 2015고정1232

상해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 21:45 on April 16, 2015, the Defendant met the victim E (the age of 61) of the former E in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (the age of 61).

Although the Defendant recommended the victim who was punished by Tin F and the court history to agree with F, the Defendant was rejected from the victim.

Accordingly, the Defendant, by her hand, inflicted bodily injury on the victim, such as “damage to the head of a part where the injury is unknown,” which requires medical treatment for about 14 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of E;

1. Part of the third protocol of trial witness E in the protocol;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A E-document;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his/her defense counsel asserts that the defendant and his/her defense counsel's assertion of the provisional payment order under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act only go beyond the victim's own discretion, and that there is no fact that the defendant did not interfere with

At the fourth trial date of this court ( October 22, 2015), the witness G testified to the effect that the victim was pushed the defendant on the ship and then the victim was sicked to move the defendant on the ship and then the victim was sicked to move the defendant on the ship, and then the victim was sicked to him. On October 13, 2016, the witness G stated to the effect that the defendant was sicked to the above circumstance, and that the victim was sicked to go beyond her own way between the defendant's his will and her will. On the fourth trial date, the statement was added to the purport that the defendant, who did not make a statement on the fourth trial date, moved to the place of his will and then sected with the defendant's will.

However, according to the witness G and H's respective legal statements, they were on the day of the instant case.

참조조문

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 2018.02.02 2017노7157

-대전지방법원 2014.01.16 2013노1574

-대전지방법원 2014.01.16 2013노1577

-서울남부지방법원 2013.10.04 2013노1208

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.05.19 2016노550