logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.11.30 2016고단2964
주택법위반
Text

1. Defendant A, B, D, F, G, H, J Defendant A, D, and F are punished by a fine of KRW 5 million, and Defendant B, and J are punished by a fine of KRW 7 million.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A: No person who violates the Housing Act shall resell or arrange the resale before the lapse of the period prescribed by Presidential Decree (hereinafter referred to as the "period for restriction on resale") the status of being selected as the occupant of housing subject to the upper limit system for selling price among multi-family housing constructed and supplied by a project undertaker in a public housing site.

The Defendant: (a) around July 11, 2015, around Sejong-si; (b) on the part of Q sold in Q, the right to sell the land as occupant of the “R apartment 508 Dong 605,” which Q sold in lots; and (c) upon receiving a request for sale from a licensed real estate agent T, sold the land to U at a premium of KRW 35 million; and (d) received KRW 1 million under the pretext of a brokerage commission.

However, pursuant to the "Special Act on the Construction of Multifunctional Administrative City in Yeongi-Gongju Area for Follow-up Measures for New Administrative Capital", the above apartment was a house subject to the upper limit system for selling prices supplied in a public housing site developed in accordance with the Multifunctional Administrative City Construction Project, which cannot resell the status of being selected as the occupant or arrange for resale for one year from the date it is possible to conclude the first housing supply contract ( July 15, 2015).

In addition, from July 11, 2015 to August 8, 2015, the Defendant arranged the resale of the status of being selected as occupant within the period of restriction on resale by the aforementioned method four times in total, such as the list of crimes (1) as shown in the attached Table of Crimes (1).

Accordingly, the defendant arranged the resale of the status of being selected as an occupant of the housing subject to the upper price ceiling system within the period of restriction on resale.

2. Defendant B: No person in violation of the Housing Act shall resell the status of being selected as the occupant of the housing subject to the upper limit system for selling prices among multi-family housing constructed and supplied by a project undertaker in a public housing site, or arrange the resale before the lapse of the “period for limitation on selling”

The Defendant, around September 21, 2014, at the W “W” office located in Sejong-si, and at the “Y apartment No. 1204, 1505,” sold by X.

arrow