logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.11.15 2016고단3290
주택법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 9, 2012, the Defendant: (a) was issued with a summary order of KRW 4 million by a licensed real estate agent in violation of the Business Affairs of Licensed Real Estate Agents and Report of Real Estate Transactions Act; and (b) returned to Sejong-si, Busan-si, Jeju-do, and Jeju-do, using funds raised by C, etc.; and (c) is a multi-purpose business entity specialized in arranging resale rights within the period of restriction on resale; and (d) selling and buying a house subscription passbook.

1. Violation of the Housing Act;

(a) No person mediating the resale of the status of being selected as an occupant within the period of restriction on resale shall resell the status of being selected as an occupant of a housing subject to the upper price ceiling system built and supplied by a business entity or arrange the resale thereof before the lapse of the period prescribed by Presidential Decree (hereinafter “period of restriction on resale”);

Nevertheless, on July 2012, 2012, the Defendant arranged for the sale of the G name, which was selected as the occupant on July 20, 2012, for the “F apartment No. 704, 1003, 704, 1003, supplied by the E Company,” through C, and received a payment for KRW 1 million around that time. However, the above apartment was a house subject to the upper price ceiling system applied to the multifunctional administrative city construction project under the Special Act on the Construction of Multifunctional Administrative City in the Yeong-si Area for the Follow-up Measures for New Administrative Capital, which was developed and developed by the Multifunctional Administrative City Construction Project under the Multifunctional Administrative City Construction Project under the "Special Act on the Construction of Multifunctional Administrative City in the Yeong-si Area for the Follow-up Measures for New Administrative Capital” and was a house that could not resell the status of being selected as the occupant or arrange for the resale of the status of being selected as the occupant before one year has passed since the date the conclusion of the first housing supply contract was possible (

Accordingly, the Defendant arranged the resale of the status of being selected as the occupant of the housing subject to the upper limit system within the period of restriction on resale in collusion with the Haman C on July 2012.

The defendant, including this, shall be recruited with C or separately from around that time to around January 2016.

arrow