logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2020.01.08 2019고단938
근로기준법위반
Text

All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.

Reasons

1. The Defendant is an employer who actually operates the manufacturing company C by employing seven full-time workers in B at the time of promotion of the facts charged in the instant case.

The Defendant works from November 1, 2017 to October 5, 2018 at the foregoing workplace.

The total amount of wages of retired D 3,264,220 won, and ② November 1, 2017 to October 5, 2018.

The total amount of wages of retired E shall be KRW 4,749,700, ③ shall work from October 1, 2017 to December 31, 2018.

The total amount of wages of retired FF KRW 18,00,000, and ④ is working from December 15, 2017 to December 31, 2018.

The total amount of wages of retired G 12,621,570 won, and 5 December 15, 2017 to December 31, 2018.

He/she shall have worked from February 19, 2018 to December 31, 2018, including the total amount of KRW 15,668,00,00.

7,128,440 won in total of wages of retired I, 7 April 2, 2018 to December 31, 2018.

The retirementJ did not pay the total of KRW 12,000,000 for 14 days from the date of retirement without good cause, without any agreement between the parties on the extension of the due date.

2. Determination

(a) Crimes of non-compliance with an intention: Article 109 (2) of the Criminal Act;

B. After the prosecution of this case, the injured workers expressed their intention that they do not want the punishment of the defendant.

(c) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;

arrow