Defendants are not guilty.

1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: Defendant B obtained the qualification of an authorized broker around December 2012; and Defendant B, from May 21, 2013 to May 9, 2016, operated real estate brokerage business under the trade name “E” in Seojin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City from May 21, 2013 to May 9, 2016.

Defendant A is a person who has worked as a brokerage assistant from December 10, 2014 to the above E.

A. No certified judicial broker in violation of the certified judicial brokerage against Defendant B shall allow another person to render brokerage services using his/her name, nor transfer or lend his/her certificate of qualification to another person.

Nevertheless, at the E office located in Young-gu Seoul Metropolitan City E, the Defendant used the Defendant’s name and used the Defendant’s name to render brokerage services, and the Defendant used the Defendant’s certificate as a certified broker in the name of the Defendant from the date of non-standing to April 25, 2016.

(b) No person shall render brokerage services using another person's name or trade name, or use another person's brokerage office registration certificate after taking over or lending the certificate;

Nevertheless, as in April 25, 2016(A), the Defendant obtained a certificate of an authorized broker from Defendant B, and as in the foregoing paragraph, 100,000 won from the lessee to rent KRW 70,000 per month rent to Ha of the previous building in the Yan-gun-gun, North Korea, the F owner of the G, for the lessee to rent KRW 101,000,000 per month.

2) A person who intends to run brokerage business shall register the establishment of a brokerage office with the head of a Si/Gun/Gu having jurisdiction over an area where he/she intends to establish a brokerage office under the conditions as prescribed by the Ordinance of the Ministry of

Nevertheless, on May 19, 2016, the Defendant arranged for K to lease the building of JJ in the Jeonjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul Special Metropolitan City (I) with the deposit amount of KRW 50,000,000,000 monthly rent of KRW 1,50,000,000.

Accordingly, the defendant acted as a broker without registration.

2. The summary of the Defendants’ assertion.