logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2020.04.23 2019고단4846
유사수신행위의규제에관한법률위반
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No one shall engage in the business of receiving contributions from many and unspecified persons under the agreement to pay the total amount of contributions or an amount in excess thereof in the future without obtaining authorization or permission under other Acts and subordinate statutes or making registration, report, etc.

From June 2017, the Defendants decided to invite investors in the “E” investment project of the Spanisher with the authority’s authorization and permission, etc., in order to attract investors in the “E” investment project from the Nam-gu Seoul metropolitan building D, Ulsan-gu, and that Defendant A would induce customers to make an investment by explaining about E, and Defendant B would act as an agent for investors’ registration of the E account and receive money from investors to transfer the said investment to the account of B B B non-coin and transfer it to the E non-Coin account.

around September 11, 2017, the Defendants, upon the public offering as above, solicited G to the effect that “E with its headquarters in Spanish” was “E, which has been designated as a third-party company from the world to H, and the airline also owns a variety of investments in finance, real estate, and IP, etc., and distribute the investment amount. The company has purchased an insurance policy equivalent to KRW 70 billion in Spanish, and if a large number of investments are damaged, it will be treated as an insurance. If investments occur, the company will pay a large amount of 4-6% of the investment amount for one year, and thus, it may gain a profit of approximately 240% to 340% from 140% to 340% of the investment amount for one year, and received a transfer from G to the account under the name of Defendant B in the name of Defendant B around September 12, 2017.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to make payment of the total amount of the investment or the amount exceeding it in the future and agreed to procure the investment amount.

Summary of Evidence

1..

arrow