The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the court below's imprisonment (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is against the defendant's wrong recognition of his or her mistake, the victims took advantage of the defendant's driver's vehicle even though the defendant knew that he or she would drive a vehicle in a drinking condition, the defendant agreed that he or she would drive a vehicle in a state with a high blood alcohol concentration to the extent that it is difficult for the defendant to drive a vehicle normally. However, in light of the course of driving the vehicle and the degree of damage, the possibility of a large traffic accident was reasonable, the circumstances in which the defendant tried to conceal his or her crime immediately after the accident occurred, the defendant was sentenced to a fine as to the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) around July 2012, and the defendant was sentenced to a fine as to the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (Unlicensed Driving) on March 7, 2013, the violation of the Road Traffic Act (Unlicensed Driving), the violation of the Road Traffic Act (Unlicensed Driving), the crime of aiding and abetting an offender, the circumstances and circumstances of the crime in this case, and the following circumstances.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.