The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the court below's imprisonment (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination takes into account the following: (a) the defendant's mistake recognized by himself/herself, the defendant's damage caused by the crime of this case is minor, the victim's agreement was smoothly agreed with, and the defendant's efforts to lead a healthy life after the crime of this case were peeped; (b) the defendant did not respond to the investigation by an investigative agency for a considerable period of time until he/she went away and is arrested at the scene immediately after the crime of this case; (c) the defendant was subject to suspended sentence due to the crime of larceny and Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) around March 2004; (d) the crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Dggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) around November 206; and (e) the crime of this case was committed again during the period of repeated crime; and (e) the punishment of this case, including the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, circumstances of the crime, means, and outcome of the crime, etc., by taking into account all the records and arguments.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.