Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years, and for ten months, for each of the defendants B.

Seized evidence 1 to 1.0

Punishment of the crime

On September 4, 2014, Defendant A was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act at the Seoul Central District Court on April 24, 2015, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Chuncheon Prison.

Defendant

B On March 12, 2015, the Seoul Southern District Court sentenced 8 months of imprisonment for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act (competence), etc., and completed the execution of the sentence in the Seoul Southern Southern District Court on May 2, 2015.

The Defendants of the 2015 Highest 2738 are not the persons handling the narcotics.

1. Defendant A

A. On July 17, 2015, the Defendant violated the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. due to psychotropic Drugs (fixture) 1) from among the Defendant’s house located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D around 17:0, the Defendant dried up for the purpose of sale via E, approximately 2.4g of the Meromatic drugs (i.e., one philopon; hereinafter “philopon”).

2) On October 25, 2015, the Defendant, at around 02:00 on October 25, 2015, laid off approximately 0.05g of philopon free of charge, 0.05g of the mutual influoral telephone room located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Gangseo-gu.

3) On October 28, 2015, around 07:30 on October 28, 2015, the Defendant, from the SM5 car parked on the road front of H hotel located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G, 0.4g of philophonephones located in F in a one-time injection machine, was cut off without compensation.

4) On November 1, 2015, at around 02:00, the Defendant sent to E for the purpose of selling 1.6g of philopon E, which was divided into two parts of a single-use type-use-use-use-use-use-use-use-use-use-use-use-use-based-use-based-use-based-use-based-use-based-use-based-use-based-based-based-

Accordingly, the defendant received a local mental medicine over four times.

B. The Defendant, in violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. due to psychotropic drugs and marijuana, and the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. (marijus) on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. (marijus) through E, by proposing, “A person who, in the place of a police officer in the middle of October 2015, has been holding the pedago 1stroopon with the scopon scopic scopic scopic