logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.10.11 2018고단3997
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 8,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 26, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment and one year of suspended execution as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) at the Seoul Southern District Court on July 26, 2018, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on August 3, 2018.

1. On April 10, 2018, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol leveling 0.072% of the blood alcohol leveling from around 03:18 on the roads in Gangseo-gu Seoul to the roads in front of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, to around 20 meters on the roads in front of Gangseo-gu Seoul Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, while driving a DNA motor vehicle with alcohol leveling 0.072% without a driver’s license.

2. On the same day as paragraph (1) 1, the Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act: around 04:06, at around 04:06, the Defendant was placed in a usual position upon receiving a report from the police officer belonging to the Gangseo-gu Police Station E in charge of drinking and receiving a request for personal information.

G's resident registration number is ‘H' and G's resident registration number was used unlawfully.

3. The Defendant forged a private document at the same time and place as set forth in paragraph (2) and conducted a drinking test as if he were G, and responded to the drinking test, and let the said police officer know the fact enter the personal information of the said G in the state of the driver’s circumstances report, and signed the “G” in the name column of the driver’s statement of the said police officer who was requested to sign from the said police officer.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant forged a copy of the State driver’s circumstantial statement report in the name of G, a private document on proof of facts without authority.

4. The Defendant, at the same time and place as Paragraph 2, presented to the police officer, who was aware of the forgery, a report on the circumstances of the driver’s statement forged, as Paragraph 3, was presented as if it was genuine.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Report on the circumstances of a driver who is to take the driving of a drinking, investigation report (report on the circumstances of the driver who is to take the driving of a drinking driver), and notification of

1. Suppression photographs;

1. A report on investigation (Correction of a suspect);

1. CCTV images for crime prevention;

arrow