logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안산지원 2020.12.17 2020고단4511
업무방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 26, 2020, the Defendant: (a) returned to the D Public Notice Board operated by the Victim C (Namnam and 60 years of age) in Ansan-si members B and five stories in Ansan-si, without any justifiable reason; (b) sent the corridor to a large voice; (c) opened the entrance of each room; (d) opened the door to the residents of the Public Notice Board; (d) took an article against the residents of the Public Notice Board; and (e) took a look at the time; and (e) took the victim’s desire to “prist, sick,” and interfere with the victim’s operation of the Public Notice Board by force.

2. At around 09:10 on the same day as the statement in paragraph 1, the Defendant obstructed the operation of the victim’s Gosiwon by avoiding disturbance for about two hours at the above D Gosiwon in the same manner as the statement in paragraph 1.

3. At around 12:00 on October 26, 2020, the Defendant sited in front of the inner clothes in front of the inner clothes store operated by the victim F (F (F, 55 years old) in Ansan-si E and the first floor in Ansan-si, the Defendant took a large voice by holding the victim in front of the inner clothes store operated by F (F, 5 years old), and interfered with the operation of the victim's store by force by avoiding disturbance for about 16 minutes.

4. On October 26, 2020, at around 12:38, 2020, the Defendant took care of the disturbance in the room without any justifiable reason, and took care of the corridor back to the corridor, and the Defendant took care of the Defendant, and the said victim C prevented the Defendant, thereby pushing the victim, and thereby debrising him, and, at the same time, interfered with the operation of the announced source by the victim by force by avoiding disturbance for about 15 minutes, such as “This cexpe and the head flap, and the head flap, are bad.”

Summary of Evidence

1. The police's statement of the defendant C in court;

1. On-site photographs of the F in each written statement, DNA- published CCTV to captures, and a report processing table of 112 reported cases;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (the analysis of CCTV by time zone);

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the same Act concerning the applicable criminal facts, the selection of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37 and Article 38(1)2 of the Criminal Act are applicable;

arrow