logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.11.23 2016고단6445
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)등
Text

As to the crime No. 1 of the judgment of the defendant (2017 order 2397) (2017 order 2397), the crime No. 2 of the judgment (2016 order 645) is committed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【The previous trial division】 On September 24, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act at the Chuncheon District Court on one year and two months, and completed the execution of the sentence at the original prison on August 3, 2014.

On September 24, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to one year by the Cheongju District Court to a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc., and the said judgment became final and conclusive on February 4, 2016, and on July 6, 2016, the Seoul Detention Center completed the enforcement of the sentence.

1. Although the Defendant was not a narcotics handler, on November 11, 2014, the Defendant purchased 50,000 won from E, which was located in Pyeongtaek-si D, by requesting F to the effect that “on the part of a person who sells a phiphone,” and by requesting F to the effect that “on the part of a person who sells a phiphone,” the price of the mectop, which is a local mental medicine, was 50,000 won, and around November 13, 2014, the Defendant purchased mecopon by additionally paying KRW 70,000 from the H market located in Busan-dong G to I and approximately KRW 5,000,000 for a phiphonephone.

2. "2016 Highest 6445".

A. A. From December 1, 2016 to December 8, 2016, the Defendant administered the spopon spopon spon spon spon spon spon spon spon spon spon spon spon spon spon spon spon spon spon, Incheon, and Seoul.

B. From around 17:36 on December 7, 2016 to around 09:40 on December 8, 2016, the Defendant damaged the utility of the victim’s property to replace KRW 1,350,000,000 in total and repair expenses incurred by the victim I operated by the J of Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, for the reason that there were abnormal sounds from the optophone medications, TV installed in a exchange network due to the optoon medication, and the vehicle from the main body of the computer, thereby emitting TV and computers.

Summary of Evidence

"2017 Highest 2397"

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A witness;

arrow