Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment with prison labor for one year.

However, this judgment is delivered to Defendant A.

Criminal facts

[Criminal Justice] On June 22, 2012, Defendant B, who was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment for fraud at the Busan District Court, was released on November 30, 2012 and passed the remaining term of imprisonment on January 10, 2013.

[A] Defendant A operates an E mobile phone agency, and Defendant B is a person who operates a G mobile phone agency in the name of the wife F.

The Defendants, using personal information, such as the name, resident registration number, etc. of other persons provided through H by their respective mobile phone agents through H, and resident registration certificates copies in the name of other persons, etc., based on the chip type inevitably installed in a mobile phone terminal, the Defendants opened the core (USIM, Univers Suber Mole) in the use of a separate mobile phone through a separate telecommunications company in which the personally identifiable information, address records, etc. of the mobile phone account holder are stored, and then came to have profits from the sale of relics and chips opened with H, and then came to have been divided into profits from the sale of relics, such as the sale of core information and chips opened with H to J, K, etc., and then use them for the dispatch of printed text on the gambling site.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Defendant A

A. As above, the Defendant, along with H on August 21, 2013, made arbitrarily a total of 210 private documents, using a copy of the Ma’s resident registration certificate provided by the 1st floor E mobile phone agent of the Jung-gu Busan metropolitan Building in Busan, using the copy of the Ma’s resident registration certificate provided by the 1st class I, see the “M”, “N” in the name column of customer registration number, and “M” in the name column of customer registration number, and signed by the applicant column by signing the Ma’s name by signing the Ma’s name. In addition, from around that time to October 22, 2013, the Defendant drafted at his own discretion the “M” mobile phone/name change contract in the name of M, which is a private document concerning rights and obligations.

Accordingly, the Defendant is H.