Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On December 16, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Daegu District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on August 11, 2017. On March 15, 2019, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution on March 23, 2019, for a period of eight months of imprisonment for fraud, etc.

1. On April 25, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around April 25, 2016, at the coffee shop located in Daegu Suwon-gu, the Defendant: (b) borrowed money to the victim C; (c) was transferred 282.5 million won to the post office account in the name of the Defendant (E) on the same day from the victim’s beliefing that “The Defendant had the right to sell the bonds of 56.2 million won at present; (d) was at the status of paying the down payment of the down payment; and (e) was performed by the redevelopment agency after the approval of the apartment project was granted, and was terminated after the completion of the contract after the approval of the apartment project or when he/she becomes disqualified as a union member, he/she shall be paid KRW 50 million,000,000,000 to the money.”

However, in fact, the defendant had been in the procedure of individual rehabilitation at the time, had already terminated the above contract for the right of sale and lost its membership, and had been liable for 500 million won to the branch, so even if he borrowed money from the victim, he did not have the intent or ability to repay the money as promised.

In this respect, the Defendant acquired pecuniary benefits by deceiving the victim.

2. On October 12, 2016, the defrauded: (a) on or around October 12, 2016, the Defendant received money from the victim C to the G bank account (H) in the name of the Defendant’s father on the same day on the same day by saying, “on the basis of an urgent need for money, he/she shall repay the money to the victim C, if he/she loans three million won.”

However, in fact, the defendant had been in the procedure of individual rehabilitation, and had been responsible for the debt amounting to 500 million won, so even if he borrowed money from the victim, he did not have an intention or ability to repay as promised.

This is the defendant.