A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The defendant's fraud against the victim D did not have any fact that he donated or intended to donate 1 billion won to Cho Jae-sung in Japan, and there was no discussion about the return of 500 million won out of his contribution to Cho Jong-sung and the above person in charge of assistance in the conciliation division and the defendant's contribution. Accordingly, even if he received 500 million won from the victim under the name of the expenses related to the return of 500 million won, he did not have any intention or ability to return 500 million won from Cho Jong-sung and contributed to the fund operated by the victim. The above amount received from the victim was thought to be used for personal purposes, such as the defendant's marriage or living expenses.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, at around September 30, 2010, received the Defendant’s 10 million won from the above F, which was located in G, G, Sinnam-si, G, for the treatment of the victim “(victims) who performed the surgery during the process of return of 50 million won from the Ham Ham Ham Ham Ham Ham Ham Ham Ham Ham Ham Ham Ham Ham Ham Ham Ham Ham Ham Ham Ham Ham Ham Ham Ha, and made a contribution to the Chom Ha, whichever was 50 million won among them. However, if the Defendant borrowed the money to use for the expenses of acquiring the participation in the course of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation, the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation.”

2. The Defendant’s fraud against the victim I did not have the intention or ability to mislead the legal party as promised to the victim and operate the legal party as it did not exist, and the money received from the victim was paid in the name of the cost of legal installation by the victim.