1. Defendant D and E in June of each credit cooperative, Defendant F in April of credit cooperative, Defendant C Co., Ltd. in fine of KRW 5,000,000.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

C. A business owner who is a legal entity established for the purpose of the construction business with the head office located in the Jung-gu Daejeon Metropolitan City, Daejeon. A business owner who is a legal entity established for the purpose of the construction business (ju) under a contract for the construction of the new construction of the employee safety and health-related work at KRW 4,770,00,000 at KRW 1,386,00,000, which is part of the construction work (hereinafter “the construction of this case”). A subcontract for the construction work at KRW 257,50,000,000, which is part of the construction work, to A Co., Ltd. (ju), and Defendant D, as the head office of the construction site of this case under the control of C, is a general safety and health-related manager who manages the general affairs of the worker safety and health-related work at the same place, and Defendant E Co., Ltd’s agent’s construction work at the construction site of this case, and Defendant D is a person who designed the construction work of this case.

1. Defendant D, E, and F’s injury, and Defendant D’s violation of the Industrial Safety and Health Act are responsible for manufacturing and installing steel-frame structures and ske structure at the construction site of this case, and Defendant D’s responsible person for managing manufacturing and installing the steel-frame structures at the construction site of this case. Although the instant structure has a sufficient and solid system dynamics so that each floor does not collapse at the time of other snow works, Defendant E neglected his duty of care. Defendant E should prepare a structural invoice for the structural structure design of the steel structure at the construction site of this case after examining the sufficient stability of the steel structure construction on the structural invoice at the time of construction design of the steel structure of this case. However, Defendant E failed to use steel-frames at the construction site of this case and did not use steel-frames connected to the water again, and when calculating safety level, the length between them should be 12m a distance between TU and TU, but shall be 2m a safe level between TU and TU. 4m.