logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 홍성지원 2015.04.03 2015고정61
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 13, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year and six months by fraud, etc. at the Cheongju District Court, and the said judgment was finalized on December 6 of the same year.

1. Around February 24, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant was a vehicle with no problem, because he/she left a vehicle with K7 and NAS.” at a nearby D parking lot located in Dong-gu, Nam-gu, Dong-gu, Seoul.

However, the fact is that the F K7 car was the vehicle that the defendant stolen from G, and HNA car was the vehicle acquired by deception from I.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received a total of KRW 57.8 million from the Defendant’s agricultural bank account under the name of the Defendant for the same day as the purchase price.

2. On February 25, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “a vehicle is a vehicle with no problem, which has been purchased or sold in the franchise and HG,” by phoneing to the victim.

However, the fact is that Jrando HG car was a vehicle acquired by the defendant from K and L.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 2,00,000 from the Defendant’s agricultural bank account under the name of the Defendant as the contract deposit for the sale and purchase of passenger cars on the same day from the victim, and received KRW 23 million in total and KRW 25 million in the same account as the remainder on the following day.

3. On February 27, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant purchased the victim at the location indicated in the foregoing paragraph 1, “The two strings and one strings, because there was a problem.”

However, the fact is that MTW car was stolen by the defendant from N, and the OV cruise car was stolen by P.

Ultimately, the Defendant deceivings the victim as above and received KRW 50,50,000 from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative Account under the name of the Defendant for the same day as the purchase price.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police of E.

arrow