logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2019.10.31 2019고단2483
모욕등
Text

The punishment of the accused shall be determined by six months of imprisonment.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 04:30 on May 5, 2019, the Defendant received the Defendant’s 112 report from four police officers, such as C, D, E, F, etc. belonging to the House B District of the Busan, U.S. police station, the victim called the victim, who was called up and consulted on the Defendant at the front of the taxi stops 17-28, 121-gil-ro, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, 121, and the head of the Dong, but he could not hear the Defendant’s desire, and the Defendant could not hear the Defendant’s desire, and the Defendant would bring the above four victims to the scene where the passage of a majority of the people in the surroundings.” On the other hand, the Defendant continued to take a bath view, such as “the victim shall be treated as the victim,” “the victim shall be treated as the victim’s driver’s license,” and “the victim shall have his desire to return the driver’s license.”

2. The Defendant at the same time and place as stipulated in Paragraph 1, 2, 300,00 won: (a) the Defendant told G to the Gyeong-do Police Station B Zone B, which was sitting in the patrol seat; (b) however, he heard the answer that the above G’s driver’s license falls under anywhere, and continued to ask the police officer belonging to the same district unit to ask the police officer who belongs to the said district unit to ask him to “the police officer has returned to the said police officer.” However, the Defendant: (a) instructed the police officer to take twice the patrol board on his hand on his hand in the patrol floor; and (b) assaulted the above G by taking two tights and tights, which were saved by the said G while receiving his control from the said G; and (c) assaulted him on two occasions.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties by police officers on handling 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement on G, D, C, E, and F;

1. Each complaint filed by D, C, E, and F;

1. A criminal investigation report (police photographic images of police officers, patrol booms and images accompanied by them);

1. A copy of the work site;

arrow