1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiffs the corresponding money indicated in the attached Table 2. The corresponding money in the attached Table 2.

1. Basic facts

A. On November 6, 1995, the Korea National Housing Corporation (the defendant was merged with the Korea Land Corporation on October 1, 2009 and became the defendant. The defendant was not classified before and after the merger) obtained approval from the Gyeonggi-do Governor on the development plan for a housing site for the housing site development project for the Gyeonggi-do Yang-gun B, C (D, E (hereinafter “instant housing site”) in accordance with the former Housing Site Development Promotion Act (hereinafter “instant development project”), and obtained approval on May 6, 1997 on the modification of the housing site development plan and implementation plan for the said housing site development project, and obtained approval on the modification of the housing site development plan and the implementation plan for the housing site development project for several times thereafter.

B. On October 31, 1997, the Defendant obtained approval from the Governor of the Gyeonggi-do to build a public apartment house of 792 household units (hereinafter “instant apartment house”) on one block of the instant housing site development project district pursuant to the former Housing Construction Promotion Act. Around June 2000, the Defendant obtained a modified approval for the housing construction project plan by changing the instant apartment to a public rental housing of 792 household units.

At the time of the first public announcement of recruitment of occupants of housing area for each household at the time of the public announcement of recruitment of occupants, housing price (united number of households) 670 18-224.34 26.281 (13.9642) 125.9820,324,000 76,026,000 96,350,000 96,350,000 93 to 184.3286.3874 (13.9890.9890), 206.206.2060,324,000,000,000 93 to 918-284.3286.15.206.20,324,000,76,0076,006,0006,30,005,000

C. Around June 28, 2000, the Defendant announced the public lease of the apartment of this case to 763 households among the 792 households, with the following first recruitment notice.

Around January 29, 2001, the Defendant completed the instant apartment, and around that time leased the instant apartment to the Plaintiffs for five years, which is a mandatory rental period.

E. As the period of mandatory lease of the apartment of this case exceeds the period of sale for sale for sale in lots, the defendant of this case between the plaintiffs and the plaintiffs around April 2006.