logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.09.24 2015고단4713
상습절도
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On April 15, 2003, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for larceny and 2 years of probation at the Seoul Central District Court on January 15, 2004, to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. at the Seoul Western District Court on March 29, 2005, to ten months of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. at the Seoul Western District Court on August 23, 2006; one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. at the Seoul Western District Court on July 16, 2008 at the Seoul Western District Court on May 1, 2014; ten months of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny and three years of suspended execution.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On April 14, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 12:00 to 12:30 on April 14, 2015, around 2015, up to 12:00 to 12:30,000 of the market value of “D” women exclusive for women in Seocho-gu Seoul, with the key of the victim E in the shower fash fash, while taking the key from the bend place, opened the victim’s right to the object; (b) cash in the victim’s possession; (c) KRW 270,000,000,000,000,000,000 won, including the gift certificates, two copies of a sales slip, and ten credit cards

2. On May 11, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 02:15, 2015, around 02:40,00 won in cash located on the part of the victim H in the “G located on the F Ground 1st, Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Faro exclusively for women; (b) placed the victim H in the vicinity of the latter key; and (c) held the victim’s right and object; and (d) held the said key in cash located

Accordingly, the defendant habitually stolen the victims' property two times.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. A H statement;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: References to criminal records, each written judgment (2014 highest 1775, 2008 highest 1574, 206 highest 1217), and investigation reports (verification reports on the date of confirmation of judgment);

1. Habituality of judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes recognizing dampness in light of the records of each crime, the frequency of crimes, the frequency of crimes, and the fact that the same kind of crimes are repeated several times in a planned manner;

1. Article 332 of the Criminal Act and Articles 332 and 332 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

arrow