The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In fact, the Defendant did not violate the traffic signal, and the victims suffered injury in need of two weeks’ medical treatment due to the instant traffic accident.

shall not be deemed to exist.

B. The lower court’s sentence (one million won in penalty) against an unfair defendant in sentencing is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances, which may be acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the lower court, namely, the Defendant, at the investigation stage, was aware of the direct fault in the red signals and entered the intersection by viewing that vehicles on the right road are still stopped without viewing the signal at the time.

In light of the facts stated in the lower judgment, the lower court also stated that the Defendant was the person who committed the instant crime, and the objective evidence, such as CCTV images at the time of the accident, correspond to the said statement (the time of photographing the CCTV images is stated as the date after the accident occurred, but it is clear that they were taken at the time of the accident in light of the vehicle moving conditions, etc., and the time indicated in the image is indicated as a lump sum at the time of the accident, and the time indicated in the image is indicated as the time of the accident, and the time indicated in the image is indicated as a lump sum at the time of the accident). In the instant accident, the victim C suffered injuries, such as knee, knee, in need of two weeks of treatment, and the victim E received physical treatment after being diagnosed with the victim by violating the intersection signal as stated in the facts charged in the lower judgment. It can be sufficiently recognized that the victims conflict with the victim and the victims suffered injuries necessary for two weeks of treatment.

Therefore, this part of the defendant's argument is without merit.

B. We examine the judgment on the unfair argument of sentencing, the Defendant’s primary offender, the degree of injury caused by the instant accident, and the fact that the automobile comprehensive insurance is subscribed to.