1. The part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to be paid under the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked.

The defendant.

Basic Facts

As an accident insurer, the Plaintiff is an insurer who has concluded an automobile insurance contract with A (hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff-insured”) and its owned B vehicle (hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff-Appellant”), and the Defendant is an insurer who has concluded an automobile insurance contract with C and its owned D vehicle (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant Oba”) as an accident insurer.

Plaintiff

On April 8, 2015, 2015, the vehicle was proceeding from the 2nd parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel between the parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel between the parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel to the parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel.

(hereinafter the above traffic accident (hereinafter referred to as the “instant traffic accident”). Due to the instant traffic accident, even even the front door part of the Plaintiff’s left-hand side of the vehicle and the front part of Defendant Otoba conflict, which led to the Plaintiff’s vehicle and Defendant Obaba, destroyed the Plaintiff’s vehicle and Defendant Obaba, and two persons, such as the Plaintiff’s passenger E and F, were injured.

At the time of the instant traffic accident, red on-and-off signal was installed in the direction of the Plaintiff’s vehicle driving along the instant intersection, and yellow on-and-off signal was installed in the direction of Defendant Otoba, but the Plaintiff’s vehicle entered the instant intersection without temporarily stopping.

At the time of the instant traffic accident, the Plaintiff’s along-way road was the first line road, Defendant Otoba road was the second line road, and the Plaintiff’s vehicle speed was 47 km, and Defendant Otoba speed was 63 km.

On July 20, 2015, the Plaintiff paid the Plaintiff insured KRW 3,647,00 as insurance money in accordance with the instant traffic accident.

Plaintiff

With respect to the instant traffic accident, the insured was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for the six months of imprisonment without prison labor due to the violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Seoul District Court Decision 2015No4967 Decided November 5, 2015), and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 13, 2015.