1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 202,552,612 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from September 13, 2014 to February 1, 2017.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. On September 13, 2014, D around 07:50 on September 13, 2014, is a freight E (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

) A driving and passing through the parallel of Pyeongtaek Dong-dong Intersection in the Gwangju Mine-gu along one-lanes from the 2nd parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel F is G Oba (hereinafter

2) While the Defendant’s vehicle was found to enter the above intersection from the left side of the three-lanes along the two-lanes of the above intersection, the Defendant’s vehicle was stopped and stopped, coming to the left side, and 18 meters down toward the intersection, and died with the front of the Defendant’s vehicle by shocking with the upper part of the crosssection, and died with the credit scarcity (hereinafter “instant accident”), and the F is “the deceased,” and the said intersection is “the instant intersection.”

2) The point where the instant accident occurred is located 28 meters away from the stop line of the Plaintiff’s vehicle driving direction, and 36.4 meters away from the stop line of the Defendant’s vehicle driving direction.

3) At the time of the instant accident, the signal apparatus of the instant intersection was visible red on-and-off signal in the direction of the Defendant’s vehicle driving, and displayed the yellow on-and-off signal in the direction of the Plaintiff’s vehicle driving. 4) At the time of the instant accident, the speed of the Defendant’s vehicle at the time of the instant accident was 19km per hour, and the speed of the Plaintiff’s vehicle was dissured or approximately 64 meters from the point where the Plaintiff’s vehicle turned off.

5) The Defendant is a mutual aid business entity that entered into a mutual aid agreement for the Defendant’s vehicle. 6) The Plaintiff is the deceased’s own consciousness.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 4 (including branch numbers, if any) and the purport of the whole pleadings

B. 1) According to the above facts of recognition, pursuant to Article 3 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act and Article 724 of the Commercial Act, the Defendant is liable to compensate the Plaintiff, who is the deceased’s heir, for the damages caused by the instant accident. 2) The Defendant is subject to D in relation to the instant accident.