logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.06.09 2015누70968
손실보상금
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, KRW 40,860,250 against the Plaintiff and its related thereto, from February 12, 2014 to June 9, 2016.

Reasons

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business approval and public notice - Housing site development business (B) - Public notice: Defendant on March 23, 201, as C public notice of the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on March 23, 201, D public notice of the same part on September 21, 2012;

(b) The Central Land Expropriation Committee’s ruling on expropriation on December 19, 2013 - Land subject to expropriation: The parcel number column in the annexed sheet of appraisal results in E in Leecheon-si - Compensation for losses on February 11, 2014 - Total of 784,17,200 won, as stated in the column for the amount of compensation for expropriation on the attached sheet of appraisal results: An appraisal corporation and one appraisal corporation;

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on June 19, 2014 - Contents of the ruling: Increase of compensation for the said land to KRW 790,313,150 in aggregate as shown in the column for the amount of compensation for the said land as a result of the appraisal of the attached Table - An appraisal corporation: An appraisal corporation: An appraisal corporation; a Liwon appraisal corporation; a Liwon appraisal corporation (hereinafter referred to as “appraisal for the ruling; including an appraisal for the expropriation; hereinafter referred to as “adjudication appraisal”); and the result of the appraisal thereof / [based on recognition] did not dispute; the evidence Nos. 2-1, 2, and 4-1, 2, 2-1, 2-2, and 3-1, 3-2, and 2-1, and the purport of the entire pleadings;

2. Current state of land to be expropriated and details of appraisal;

A. The current status of the land to be expropriated was adjacent to F. 2,021 square meters and G 632 square meters, among each of the lands to be expropriated, and was used together as a vinyl house site and a field for farming as at the time of the date of the ruling of expropriation. The land was also adjacent to H field 264 square meters and 330 square meters in I field, and was used together as a warehouse site and a field.

(hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant lands”) B.

1) The AppellateJ of the first instance court had calculated the total amount of compensation for each land of this case as KRW 831,173,400, as stated in the column for the original amount of compensation in the table of the results of the attached appraisal.

The above appraiser is referred to as "court appraiser", and the results of the appraisal are as follows.

arrow