1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 64,975,450 for Plaintiff A; and (b) KRW 68,99,120 for Plaintiff B; and (c) for each of them, from November 7, 2015 to September 7, 2017.

1. Details, etc. of ruling;

(a) Project name (1) Project approval and public announcement: C Housing redevelopment rearrangement project 2): Public announcement of project implementation authorization for Defendant 3: D public announcement of Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on December 19, 2013;

B. The date of expropriation on September 18, 2015: The date of expropriation on September 18, 2015: The object of expropriation on November 2, 2015: each land listed in the column for objects of expropriation in the attached table of the appraisal results of the plaintiffs' ownership or sharing in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter "each land of this case") and obstacles (hereinafter "in the case of this case"): 4 the same as each stated in the column for the amount of compensation for expropriation in the attached table of the appraisal results: the central appraisal corporation, the central appraisal corporation, the appraisal corporation (hereinafter "appraisals for expropriation") and the appraisal corporation (hereinafter "appraisals for expropriation"; the result of the appraisal is referred to as "the result of the appraisal of expropriation").

C. Compensation for the Central Land Tribunal’s objection No. 1 on March 24, 2016: Each entry in the column for the amount of compensation for the objection as a result of the appraisal in the attached Table No. 201: An appraisal corporation: Cre Chang appraisal corporation, Fred Public appraisal corporation (hereinafter “appraisals for the objection”); the result of the appraisal; “the result of the appraisal;” “the result of the appraisal of the objection”; and “an appraiser for the acceptance ruling,” and “an appraiser for the objection,” respectively; the purport of the entire pleadings is as follows: (a) there is no dispute; (b) evidence No. 6, 10; (c) evidence Nos. 2 and 3 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply); and (c) each entry in the appraisal ruling No.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiffs’ assertion appraisers calculated the amount of compensation by individually assessing the F-309 square meters (attached Form 1 and 5 as the land listed in the table Nos. 1 and 5 as the result of the appraisal in the attached Form) and G-63 square meters (hereinafter “instant land No. 1”), which are used together with a single parcel or a different lot, and omitting some obstacles in the evaluation, so the Defendant is justifiable to the Plaintiffs.