1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1. The first instance court;

1. The grounds for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are the same as the grounds for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for cases where the judgment is used or added as follows, and thus, they are quoted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of

2. Parts used or added;

A. Of the judgment of the first instance court, the first instance court held that “the Defendant was the president of the Intervenor joining the Defendant,” “The Defendant was the president of the Intervenor joining the Defendant from June 11, 2008 to March 22, 201,” respectively. The Defendant was the president of the Intervenor joining the Defendant.”

B. Of the judgment of the first instance court, the “10,000 won per share” in the third part of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed to be “5,000 won per share”; the “agreement on April 13, 2010” in the third part shall be deemed to be “ April 30, 2010”; and the “Agreement on April 9” shall be deemed to be “Agreement (Evidence 166)” respectively.

C. Of the judgment of the first instance court, the first instance court ordered and supervised “the above illegal acts” of the first instance court 12 as “the Plaintiff is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for damages in violation of the duty of loyalty and duty of care, such as ordering or supervising the above illegal acts, or neglecting it with the knowledge thereof at least, and neglecting it (see preparatory documents of May 19, 2017).”

Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the 15th of the 5th of the 15th of the 5th of the 15th of the 15th of the 15th of the 15th of the 15th of the 15th of the 195th judgment "the revocation and the 2.3 billion US dollars (in Korean, approximately 2.74 billion US dollars) of the 2.3 billion won of the 2.3 billion won of the 2006th of the 19th of the 196th of the 19

E. Of the judgment of the first instance court, paragraph 15 of the 16th sentence shall be amended as follows:

“(B)” under Article 374(1)1 of the Commercial Act, which requires a special resolution of the general meeting of shareholders, as to whether the existence of a company constitutes a disposal of important property, is organized and organic for a particular business purpose.