logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.04.07 2015가합527569
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff A, B, and C KRW 112,064,802, the plaintiff D, and E respectively, KRW 56,032,401 and each of the above amounts.

Reasons

1. The facts below the facts of recognition may be acknowledged, either in dispute between the parties or in full view of the entries and the whole purport of arguments set forth in Gap evidence 1 to 20.

1) guilty of the deceased F and execution of sentence 1) the network F (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”).

(2) On September 30, 1970, the court below found the deceased guilty of all the remaining charges except the charges concerning the violation of the National Security Act, as shown in Attachment 1, and sentenced the deceased to three years of imprisonment with prison labor and suspension of qualification for three years on November 8, 1969. The court below found the deceased guilty of all the charges except the charges concerning the violation of the National Security Act, as shown in Attachment 1, as shown in Attachment 1, by the Jeonju District Court 69Da3400 on November 8, 1969.

3) As to this, the deceased and the prosecutor appealed to the Gwangju High Court as 70Do138, and the Gwangju High Court rendered a judgment that dismissed the prosecutor’s appeal on the part of the judgment below against the deceased on July 22, 1970 regarding the violation of the anti-public law due to the violation of Article 6(3) of the anti-public law, which was prosecuted by the court below as to the violation of Article 6(2) of the anti-public law on the part of the conviction of the judgment of the judgment of the court below against the deceased on July 22, 1970, on the ground that the court below erred in the application of Article 6(2) of the anti-public law.

(4) On October 14, 1972, the deceased and the prosecutor appealed as 70Do1809, but on October 30, 1970, the judgment subject to a retrial became final and conclusive by the Supreme Court rendered a judgment of dismissal of final appeal, which became final and conclusive. (4) On September 29, 1969, the deceased was detained without a warrant for three years (1,112 days) from the time when he was committed to the police station of Jeollabuk-do to the time when he was released to the expiration of the term of punishment.

(b)decision of commencing a new trial;

arrow