(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.02.07 2017누60910

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.02.07 2017누60910

귀화허가신청불허가처분취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance, since Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act are the same as that for the judgment of the court of first instance except for the submission or addition of part of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows.

(hereinafter the meaning of the abbreviationd language used in this subparagraph is the same as the judgment of the first instance). 2. 2. The second part of the language used or added is used by converting " August 13, 2010" into " April 30, 2010", and adding "No. 1" to "No. 11."

Part 4 of the 12th page "A No. 5" was written with "A No. 5 and 9," and the 14th page "B 21, 192" with "C. 21, 1992."

Part 5 of the 12th page "In Suwon District Court around 2016" shall be applied " from 2014 to 2016, from Suwon District Court, etc.".

After the 6th of the first 7th conduct, “(The plaintiff is recognized to have passed an interview on basic knowledge for naturalization)” is added to “(The plaintiff is recognized to have passed an interview on basic knowledge for naturalization review).”

The witness of the 7th line " shall be deemed to be a witness of the first instance trial", the 16th line "Nos. 1 and 9 of the A" shall be deemed to be "No. 1, 9, and the 7th line "No. 1, 9, 18 of the A", and the 7th line "No. 20 through 8th line "no. the plaintiff and B have any data" shall be deemed to be having shown a natural communication process between the plaintiff and the couple, such as insufficient points.

The "Witness" in the 7th sentence shall be filled with "Witness of the first instance trial".

The 10th place of residence of the plaintiff was used as "place of residence of the plaintiff until the time of the first instance trial", and the 12-13th place of residence was used as follows.

“The text messages sent and received by the Plaintiff from June 30, 2014 to June 14, 2016.”

참조조문

-민사소송법 제420조

-행정소송법 제8조 제2항

유사 판례

-대구고등법원 2020.06.26 2019나26473

-제주지방법원 2020.07.14 2019나14653

-제주지방법원 2020.12.08 2020나10411

-서울고등법원 2013.12.12 2013누10344

-서울고등법원 2016.06.10 2015나2019733